Bookmiller v. Jones
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
It is inferable from tbe testimony that tbe laborer's lien asserted by plaintiff on January 7, 1926, was for work done or completed within the period of 60 days preceding, and hence tbe plea of 60 days’ limitation was properly denied. Tbe plea would have been good as to labor done under other contract assignments prior to September 28, 1925, but the record does hot present that question.
It is .insisted that plaintiff, suing alone, could not recover, because his eoworker, Savage, was jointly interested with him in the compensation due for their joint or concurrent labor and was therefore a…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Forest Hill Corp. v. Latter & Blum, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Springer v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Martin v. Birmingham Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Watson v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. House of Van Praag, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.