Lenoir v. Valley River Mining Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was an action for the recovery of land, tried before Hoke, J., and a jury, at Spring Term, 1892, of Cherokee Superior Court. Plaintiff appealed. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
MacRae, J.:
This case was here on appeal, and was held over for re-argument at September Term, 1889' (104 N. C., 490). And at February Term, 1890, a new trial was granted, on the ground that his Honor had improperly excluded evidence offered by defendant tending to show color of title to an undivided one-third of the land in controversy, and possession thereunder for seven years. It comes up now upon the plaintiffs’ appeal from a judgment that the plaintiffs are owners of only an undivided two-thirds of said land, and that they be let into possession of the same with the defendant, and that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Foster v. HackettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Overcash v. . KitchieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Yancey v. . GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Lenoir v. Valley River Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allred v. Smith.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Carson v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Foster v. . HackettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Clark v. . BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Morehead v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.