Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1995No. WD 49705PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FENNER, Chief Judge.

Nanetta S. Ford appeals from her conviction, after jury trial, of the class D felony of tampering -with physical evidence, section 575.100, RSMo 1994,1 for which she was sentenced to one year imprisonment. On appeal, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her conviction and contends that the trial court plainly erred in submitting Instruction No. 5, the verdict director, to the jury. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On appeal we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences flowing therefrom in the light most favorable to the verdict.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. State v. ClineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. State v. NolanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. State v. MartindaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. NeelMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. RickmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API