Legal Opinion
State v. Cochran, 2006 Ca 87 (8-31-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 2007No. 2006 CA 87PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Daryl Cochran appeals from the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea in the Clark County Court of Common Pleas. For the following reasons, the trial court's judgment will be affirmed.
{¶ 2} On February 15, 2000, Cochran entered a negotiated plea of guilty to murder, aggravated robbery, and tampering with evidence, arising out of an incident on October 22, 1999. In his plea agreement, Cochran agreed to sentences of fifteen years to life in prison for the murder, ten years in prison for aggravated robbery, and five years in prison for tampering with evidence, to be served…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. PrestonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. CochranOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. SulekOhio Court of Appeals · 2011