Legal Opinion

Beardmore v. Ling

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 17, 1969No. 45,397PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

This is the latest in a series of cases reaching this court from the western reaches of our state involving the assessment of oil and gas properties. The plaintiffs, who are partners doing business as Beardmore Drilling Company, own and operate five oil and gas leases in Hodgeman County. They will be referred to herein either as plaintiffs or as Beardmore.

For the calendar year 1965, the five leases were assessed by the county clerk of Hodgeman County, wearing his assessor’s hat, in the aggregate sum of $143,525. This figure was designed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Addington v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. In RE PETITION OF HAMM v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  4. Cities Service Oil Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Harshberger v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  2. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. McManaman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Gordon v. HiettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API