Legal Opinion
Geisert v. Corriveau
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 10, 1956No. Civ. A. 14235PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICARD, District Judge.
Action to collect alleged unpaid overtime compensation jointly and severally against both defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
Findings of Fact
Plaintiffs, citizens of Michigan, commenced this action against defendants Joseph A. Corriveau, a Michigan citizen, and the Corr Instrument Company, a corporation organized under the laws of this state, asking a joint and several judgment in the amount of $12,908.46 as compensation for work in excess of forty hours per week allegedly performed between April, 1952 and December, 1954. In the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Johnson v. Butler Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. AbbateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Rompe v. YablonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Matusik v. LargeNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Berry v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1967
- Trio Process Corp. v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966