Legal Opinion

Rapaport v. Buckhead Coach, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1998No. A98A1214PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Alan Rapaport appeals from an order finding him in contempt of a consent order and ordering him to pay attorney fees. He contends the trial court erred in holding him in contempt and in imposing a sanction not permitted by law. We conclude that the trial court did not err in finding Rapaport in contempt, but that payment of attorney fees is not a permissible sanction in a criminal contempt action. We therefore affirm the finding of contempt, but we reverse that portion of the trial court’s order ordering Rapaport to pay Buckhead Coach’s attorney fees and remand to the trial court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Teamsters Local Union No. 528 v. Allied Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Carey Canada, Inc. v. HinelySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. Epps v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Minor v. MinorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. Hill v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rolleston v. CherryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Norred v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. J. Michael Vince, LLC v. Suntrust BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API