Siemonsma v. David Manufacturing Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
In this appeal, we affirm the trial court’s granting of summary judgment and hold (1) that a liability insurance company had no duty to advise an insured of the termination of the agency relationship between the insurance company and the local insurance agency and (2) that the company, under the facts presented, had no duty (a) to advise the insured of its intention not to renew insured’s policy or (b) to procure replacement insurance.
FACTS
Plaintiff Laura Siemonsma instituted an action against David Manufacturing Company and Peterson Grain Systems Inc. (PGS) for the wrongful…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Gutierrez v. Dairyland InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hoefler v. Farm and City Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Cambron v. North-West InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Zukaitis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lesa M. Primeaux, Formerly Known as Lesa M. Lamont, Formerly Known as Lisa M. Bad Wound v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Lesa M. Primeaux, Formerly Known as Lesa M. Lamont, Formerly Known as Lisa M. Bad Wound v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Lesa Primeaux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Siemonsma v. David Manufacturing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988