Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 8, 2005No. C011041CV; A123855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

The state appeals a judgment granting petitioner post-conviction relief. The post-conviction court determined that petitioner received inadequate assistance of counsel in the trial that led to his conviction on three counts of sexual abuse in the third degree. The state contends that the post-conviction trial record lacks the required showing that petitioner’s counsel’s allegedly inadequate performance had a tendency to affect the outcome of petitioner’s criminal trial. We agree and, consequently, reverse.

A jury found petitioner guilty of three of four charged incidents of sexual abuse in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ashley v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ayer v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Green v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API