Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1955No. A-4737PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garwood

The only question for our decision is whether the majority of the San Antonio Court of Civil Appeals rightly granted the motion of our respondent, the defendant and appellee below, to strike the statement of facts and accordingly affirm the non obstante judgment of the trial court against our petitioner, the plaintiff and appellant below, the sole ground of the motion being the failure of petitioner’s counsel to file the statement of facts in the trial court until nine days after the fifty-day period specified in paragraph (a) of Rule 381. (Texas Rules Civ. Proc. Such rules are intended by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matlock v. MatlockTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Cocke v. Birr.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Gerneth v. Galbraith-Foxworth Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Seaboard Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. HalbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Punch v. GerlachTexas Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roberson Farm Equipment Company v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Pink v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
  3. Coleman v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Douglas v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Fellers v. Anco Sales CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API