Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lancaster v. Woody

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application for mandamus, on the relation of J. W. Lancaster, against Frank H. Woody, district judge.

1Opinion of the CourtPigott, J.

In this case there was issued an alternative-writ of mandamus requiring the defendant to show cause before this court why he should not issue letters of administration to the relator, based upon an application containing-substantially the following averments :

On April 23, 1895, the relator, being then the public administrator of Ravalli County, Montana, made application to the District Court of that county for letters of administration upon the estate of one Eva B. Liter, alleged to be dead, accompanying his petition with a written request in behalf of the mother and sisters of the decedent,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Dewar's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Estate of MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. In re Liter's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Overall v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Craigie's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Estate of MoraghanCalifornia Superior Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API