Legal Opinion
W. Claude Sharpe v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company and Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 10, 1976No. 75--4090PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The Judgment of the District Court is affirmed on its memorandum opinion and order dated August 19, 1975, hereto attached.
Affirmed.
APPENDIX
W. CLAUDE SHARPE, Plaintiff, Civ. A. No. 75-8-Amer. v. SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
WILBUR D. OWENS, Jr., District Judge.
Defendants in the above-captioned case have filed their motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint on the basis of the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations set forth in Georgia Code Annotated § 3-1004. Plaintiff’s diversity action was filed on May 8, 1975, seeking the sum of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Johnson v. Bradstreet Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Robinson v. BomarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Hutcherson v. DurdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Robert Marc EdelmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Laine v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978