People v. Winkler
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Glenn County, and from an order denying a new trial. William M. Pinch, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendant having been convicted of a violation of the local option law (Stats. 1911, p. 599), appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The indictment charged that the defendant on or about the twentieth day of November, 1914, in the county of Glenn, did “take an order from, sell and deliver, to one M. Hamilton, alcoholic liquor,” within a supervisorial district which was no-license territory.
The defendant demurred to the indictment on the ground that it charged more than one offense, and that the several offenses were not stated in separate counts.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- State v. CullinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Partin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. TinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918