Legal Opinion

Don Copeland, et al. v. Energizer Holdings, Inc., et al.; Portable Power, Inc., et al. v. Energizer Holdings, Inc., et al.; Kimberly Schuman, et al. v. Energizer Holdings, Inc., et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 7, 2026No. 5:23-cv-02087Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 DON COPELAND, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02087-PCP (SVK) 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION RE 8 v. PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT 9 ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 137 10 Defendants. 11 PORTABLE POWER, INC., et al., Case No. 23-cv-02091-PCP (SVK) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. Re: Dkt. No. 143 14 ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 KIMBERLY SCHUMAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02093-PCP (SVK) 17 Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. No. 114 18 v. 19 ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 20 Defendants. 21 22 23…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDermott Will & Emery LLP v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Rico v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. O'Gara Coach Co. v. Ra, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API