Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The respondent, the commissioner of correction, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court granting the second amended petition for a writ of habeas coipus filed by the petitioner, Odilio Gonzalez. On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly concluded that the petitioner was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel because (1) the sixth amendment does not confer a right to the effective assistance of counsel in matters pertaining to credit for *707presentence confinement and (2) the petitioner did not meet his burden of showing deficient performance by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Gonzalez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Yashenko v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017