Legal Opinion
Otto Engdahl v. Department of the Navy
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 17, 1990No. 89-3326PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
Otto Engdahl appeals the decision of the full Merit Systems Protection Board (Board), sustaining his suspension without pay from employment by the Department of the Navy (Navy or government). See Engdahl v. Department of the Navy, 40 M.S.P.R. 660 (1989) (final decision). Because we conclude the suspension was lawful under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 and did not violate Engdahl’s due process rights under the fifth amendment, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Engdahl held a position as an electrician at the Naval Air Development Center in Warminster, Pennsylvania. On November 19, 1987 he was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Maurice Isabel, United States of America v. Ronald Descoteaux, A/K/A Piece of Cake, A/K/A Wacky RonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Homar v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Earl v. Dunnington, III v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Edward Richardson and Lorenzo Mosely v. United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Strouss v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.