Legal Opinion

United States v. Mansour Sanjar

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 30, 2017No. 15-20025PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Main’s petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Main’s petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED that our prior panel decision, United States v. Sanjar, 853 F.3d 190 (5th Cir. 2017), is WITHDRAWN as to Adam Main, and the following is SUBSTITUTED in its place. The only changes to the prior opinion are in sections V(B), VII(A), and the conclusion.

The reason Willie Sutton once gave for robbing banks is true of Medicare today: that’s where the money is. So it is not surprising that we consider another case alleging a…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Bikundi, Sr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Peter HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Kim RicardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Benjamin MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Roland PulliamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API