Legal Opinion

S & Q Construction Co. v. Haynie

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1963No. Civ. No. 10618PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

This is an application by S & Q Construction Company and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company for a writ of prohibition or supersedeas to prevent enforcement of a money judgment in favor of M. D. Haynie.

S & Q was the contractor on a public construction project for the City of Stockton. Hartford was its surety on a bond furnished in accordance with the provisions of section 4200 et seq. of the Government Code. Haynie was a subcontractor on the project.

Haynie sued S & Q and Hartford to recover the balance allegedly due for work performed. In a separate action S & Q sought damages from Haynie…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trede v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Ex Parte RalstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Solomon v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API