S & Q Construction Co. v. Haynie
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
This is an application by S & Q Construction Company and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company for a writ of prohibition or supersedeas to prevent enforcement of a money judgment in favor of M. D. Haynie.
S & Q was the contractor on a public construction project for the City of Stockton. Hartford was its surety on a bond furnished in accordance with the provisions of section 4200 et seq. of the Government Code. Haynie was a subcontractor on the project.
Haynie sued S & Q and Hartford to recover the balance allegedly due for work performed. In a separate action S & Q sought damages from Haynie…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trede v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Ex Parte RalstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Solomon v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975