Legal Opinion
Bennett v. T & F DISTRIBUTING CO.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 16, 1971PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
117 N.J. Super. 439 (1971)
285 A.2d 59
MIRIAM BENNETT AND CHARLES BENNETT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
T & F DISTRIBUTING CO., OTHERWISE KNOWN AS KIRBY SALES & SERVICE, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND KIRBY VACUUM CORP., THE CITY OF NEPTUNE AND THE SCOTT AND FETZER CO., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 29, 1971.
Decided December 16, 1971.
Before Judges COLLESTER, MINTZ and LYNCH.
Mr. Philip G. Auerbach argued the cause for respondents Miriam Bennett and Charles Bennett (Messrs. Drazin, Warshaw, Auerbach & Rudnick, attorneys; Mr. Robert T. Winter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Majestic Realty Associates, Inc. v. Toti Contracting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Jackson v. Muhlenberg HospitalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Bradley v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Anderson v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Miklos v. Liberty Coach Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Becker v. Interstate PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Evans v. MorsellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Salorio v. GlaserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Brown v. Vanity Fair Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.