Legal Opinion

Centeno v. United States

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 11, 2020No. 4:16-cv-00811Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION HEBER CENTENO, #65426-179 § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16cv811 § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:14cr81(10) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is pro se Movant Heber Centeno’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, challenging his Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division conviction. After careful consideration and for the reasons stated below, the Court will deny the motion. BACKGROUND On July 27, 2015, Movant pleaded guilty to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API