King v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of burglary and a three year sentence in the Department of Correction was assessed. For reversal of that judgment appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to establish intent to commit larceny as charged in the information. We cannot agree.
A burglary is committed whenever anyone unlawfully breaks or enters a building “with the intent to commit .... larceny.” Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-1001 (Repl. 1964). The appellant was found by the police lying on the floor in a local junior high school. They had responded to an alarm system…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Scates v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Clay v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. OcheltreeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Golden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Grays v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Grays v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.