Legal Opinion

Murdock Acceptance Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1955No. 15158_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

After careful consideration, we find ourselves in agreement with the excellent opinion of the district court reported in 121 F.Supp. 265 et seq.

Admittedly the purchaser did have both a record and a reputation for violating laws of the State of Mississippi relating to liquor. That being true, a statutory condition precedent to remission or mitigation of forfeiture was that one or more of the designated authorities, in answering the claimant’s inquiry, should have informed claimant that the purchaser had no such record or reputation, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3617(b). The answer from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DoddCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. United States v. One 1951 Chevrolet Tudor AutoDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Murdock Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. United States v. One 1955 Model Ford 2-door CoachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. Bond Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. United States v. One 1960 Ford Pickup Truck, Serial No. F10c0a17418, General Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. No. 17223Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API