Legal Opinion

Laizure v. Washington County

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 18, 2019No. 3:17-cv-01254Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON SETH EUGENE LAIZURE, Case No. 3:17-cv-01254-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, by and through WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, PHONG TRAN, Defendants. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Seth Eugene Laizure (“Laizure”) filed this action against Defendants Phong Tran (“Deputy Tran”) and Washington County (together, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the First and Fourth Amendments pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(“Section 1983”), as well as state law claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API