Legal Opinion
United States v. Euceda-Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 19, 1985No. 84-5068PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals from an order of the district court, entered pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(d)(2), suppressing certain post-arrest statements made by the defendants to a federal agent because the prosecutor failed to provide defense counsel with the substance of the statements until three days prior to trial. Concluding that the district court misconstrued the scope of its authority to remedy a party’s delayed compliance with a Rule 16 discovery order and that a less severe sanction would have achieved the result the court contemplated in entering the order, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Fred "Freddy Campo" Campagnuolo, John "Jackie Campo" Campagnuolo, and Michael "Mike Douglas" GougulesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Gonzalo GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. Robert Irving Eyster, A/K/A Bobby, Jack Leroy MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. PevetoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jack C. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Tony Ray Wicker and Vickie SilerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Marlon MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.