Legal Opinion

Jolly v. Queen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1965No. 29PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

“It is well settled law in this State, and it seems to be universally so held, that the mother of an illegitimate child is its natural guardian, and, as such, has the legal right to its custody, care and control, if a suitable person, even though others may offer more material advantages in life for the child,” Browning v. Humphrey, 241 N.C. 285, 287, 84 S.E. 2d 917, 918; accord, Wall v. Hardee, 240 N.C. 465, 82 S.E. 2d 370; In re Cranford, 231 N.C. 91, 56 S.E. 2d 35; In re McGraw, 228 N.C. 46, 44 S.E. 2d 349; In re Foster, 209 N.C. 489, 183 S.E. 744; In re Shelton, 203 N.C. 75, 164 S.E. 332;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Dellinger v. BollingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Thayer v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. In Re SheltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Allen Ex Rel. Allen v. HunnicuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Petersen v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Adams v. TessenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Settle by and Through Sullivan v. BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API