Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Heckman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Montgomery district court; A. H. Skid-| more, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pollock, J.:
A contention, more difficult of dispo-' sition than tbe merits of the controversy, arises in this case upon the form of the pleadings. This is an action brought on a policy of insurance. The petition sets forth a copy of the policy and alleges a total loss of the inshred property. ' The policy contains provisions for the ascertainment, by aboard of appraisers, of the amount of the loss in a case of disagreement as to the amount, as a condition precedent and prerequisite to the bringing of an action on the policy. These conditions, however,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Havens v. Germania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Royal Insurance Co. v. McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Williams v. Hartford Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Lancashire Insurance v. BushNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Corbett v. . Spring Garden Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Firemen's Insurance Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. EldracherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Mercer v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Meyer Sanitary Milk Co. v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.