Legal Opinion

Markham Warehouse & Elevator Co. v. Plotner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Matagorda County; Wells Thompson, Judge. Action by Markham Warehouse & Elevator Company against Plotner & Stoddard. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFly, J.

Appellant sued appellees to recover the contract price of 5,000 pounds of binding twine and certain brokerage, all amounting to $550. This is a second appeal; the opinion on the former appeal being found in 122 S. W. 443, where a full statement of the case is made. The cause was heard by a jury, but after the testimony had been introduced, and appellees had tendered into court the amount of $82, the value of the twine used by them, the court instructed the jury to return a verdict for appellees, which was done, and the court rendered judgment that appellants should “have and receive the sum…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. F. B. Fogel & Co. v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Columbian Iron Works & Dry Dock Co. v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCaskill v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Bankers' Mortg. Co. of Topeka v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Dalton Adding MacH. Sales Co. v. Valley Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Mathis Equipment Company v. RossonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Mathis Equipment Company v. RossonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API