Legal Opinion
In Re AC
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 1990No. 87-609PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
573 A.2d 1235 (1990)
In re A.C., Appellant.
No. 87-609.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued En Banc September 22, 1988.
Decided April 26, 1990.
Robert E. Sylvester, Washington, D.C., and Lynn M. Paltrow, with whom Dawn Johnsen, Janet Benshoof, New York City, Rachael N. Pine, Leslie A. Harris, Arthur B. Spitzer, and Elizabeth Symonds, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant A.C.
Barbara F. Mishkin, with whom Steven J. Routh and Katie G. Lewis, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee L.M.C.
Vincent C. Burke, III, with whom Jack M.H. Frazier, Washington, D.C., was on the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Woods Ex Rel. Simpson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Pansing v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995