Legal Opinion

Goode v. State

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 30, 1988No. 87-014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In Goode v. State, 147 Vt. 646, 514 A.2d 322 (1986) (mem.), this Court reversed the dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint and remanded for fact finding on his claim that the statute of limitations, which the trial court found had run, was tolled by plaintiff’s insanity. See 12 V.S.A. § 551. On remand the trial court found that the statute of limitations was not tolled and again dismissed the action because: (1) according to his testimony plaintiff was insane solely with respect to this litigation and could function in all other parts of his life, and, thus, in the court’s view, was not “insane”;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Goewey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Decker v. FinkCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Harrington v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Merrill v. RevilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re KindleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cooperative Fire Ins. Ass'n v. CombsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  3. Costello v. Gannett Satellite Information Network Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1996
  4. Virginia Fila v. Spruce Mountain InnSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. Virginia Fila v. Spruce Mountain InnSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API