Legal Opinion

Bourdieu v. Seaboard Oil Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1944No. Civ. No. 3091PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is an action for damages for claimed injuries to surface rights of land occupied by respondent under certain United States stoekraising-homestead acts, against Kettleman North Dome Association, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as KNDA), and others, who acquired certain leasehold mineral rights therein from the United States under a mineral leasing act.

The original pleadings and issues in this action are set *203forth and the nature of respondent’s cause of action is fully stated and discussed in two former appeals (Bourdieu v. Seaboard Oil Corporation, 38 Cal.App.2d 11 [100 P.2d 528],…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. United States v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  3. Kellogg v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Jacob Tome Institute v. CrothersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  5. Nathan v. DierssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Enter GRB, LLC v. Stull Ranches, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Wall v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Mountain Fuel Supply Company, a Utah Corporation v. Emory C. Smith and Verland E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  4. Munoz v. PL Hotel Group, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. Munoz v. PL Hotel Group, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API