Chopelas v. North River Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Justice.
This is an attempt to have reviewed by this court, by means of writ of error, the judgment entered in a consolidated cause in a district court of Dallas county. In one of these suits, Pete Chopelas and wife were plaintiffs and North River Insurance Company and General Insurance Company were the defendants. The Minnesota Life Insurance Company and Murray Investment Company were also interested-in this suit as plaintiffs. This suit was to recover on policies of insurance issued by the North River Insurance Company and General Insurance Company of America, because of a fire,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kolp v. ShraderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Mowrey v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Shipp v. Metzger DairiesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Stuart Independent School Dist. v. Wilson Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Washita Ranger Oil Co. v. DisneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
3Cited by1 opinion
- Armstrong v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940