Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). Defendant contends that his statements during the plea allocution, coupled with his allegedly exculpatory statements at sentencing, cast doubt upon his guilt and thus that County Court had a duty to make further inquiry at sentencing. We disagree. Because nothing in the plea allocution casts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. RileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GarbariniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. SchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. ContiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. People v. SciasciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. People v. Faria (David)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API