Siwek v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson
The question in this case is whether a retired Chicago police officer is entitled to receive his annuity and pension benefits despite being convicted of two felony drug offenses. The answer requires us to explore the relation or connection, if any, between the felonies and his service as a policeman. We conclude this former police officer is not entitled to benefits.
FACTS
Neither party disputes the underlying facts of this case.
In 1992, Chicago police officer Raymond Siwek was convicted of two counts of unlawful possession of a controlled substance. At trial, the State’s evidence showed Siwek…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Niven v. SiqueiraIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Kerner v. State Employees' Retirement System of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Calabrese v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Cullen v. Retirement Board of the Policeman's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- DiFiore v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Devoney v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Illinois Health Maintenance Organization Guaranty Ass'n v. Department of InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Grever v. Board of Trustees of the Illinois Municipal Retirement FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Bloom v. Municipal Employees' Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Walker v. DartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.