Marina Saucedo-Arevalo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Petitioner Marina Saucedo-Arevalo petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l). Petitioner entered the country in 2002 and therefore cannot satisfy the 10-year continuous physical presence requirement. Her mother entered the country in 1993, but the BIA held that her mother’s physical presence cannot be imputed to Petitioner for purposes of cancellation of removal. Reviewing de novo, Castillo-Cruz v. Holder, 581 F.3d 1154, 1158-59 (9th Cir.2009), we agree. Accordingly, we deny the petition.
“[Tjhis court…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Barrios v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Castillo-Cruz v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Benjamin Lepe-Guitron v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Dao Vang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Khoshfahm v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- DUARTE-LUNA and LUNABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
- Khoshfahm v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Khoshfahm v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011