Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Bakewell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the Second District Court of New Orleans,

1Opinion of the CourtLabauve, J.

The plaintiff alleges that he is duly qualified as curator to the vacant succession of Henry Ackerman, who was domiciled in the Parish of St. Bernard, and that he was appointed by the District Court of the Second Judicial District of Louisiana, holding sessions in said Parish of St. Bernard.

That subsequently to petitioner’s application W. G. Bakewell applied to the said Second District Court of New Orleans to be appointed, and was, after publication, appointed curator to the same succession. He avers that the judgment appointing said W. G. Bakewell curator, is null, for this: That the said…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. GilsdorffIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API