Reed v. Employment Security Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.
Plaintiff was employed by.defendant company. It had established a rule that an employee would be discharged from employment if a second writ of garnishment of his wages were served-upon-the company. Within a period of 9 months, 4 garnishments of plaintiff’s wages were served on ft. In consequence, he was discharged.
Plaintiff thereafter applied for unemployment compensation. The case went from commission, to referee, to appeal board and circuit court and is now here on appeal from a holding and judgment of disqualification for benefits because, in the language of the statute (CLS 1956, §…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Storey v. Meijer, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Laswell v. Industrial Commission of Missouri, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Smith v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Parks v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Washington v. Amway Grand PlazaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.