Ex Parte Cannon
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentDouglas, Judge
The majority holds the indictment to be fundamentally defective because it did not allege that the burglary was with the intent to commit a named felony or theft.
Cannon entered a plea of guilty to the offense of burglary in the present case. According to his application for habeas corpus he also entered a plea of guilty to another offense of burglary. When this cause was set for submission he did not contend that the elements of theft were not alleged. He contended that no culpable mental state was alleged. His lawyer knew what he was charged with. There was no motion to quash the indictment.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Luna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Duckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Teniente v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Ex Parte McKayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.