Legal Opinion

PINCKNEY v. SOMERSET PROBATION CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 13, 2025No. 3:24-cv-08474Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DAVID HENRY PINCKNEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-8474 (RK) (JTQ) v. MEMORANDUM OPINION SOMERSET PROBATION CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Defendant. KIRSCH, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendant Somerset Probation Child Support Enforcement’s! (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) pro se Plaintiff David Henry Pinckney’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Pinckney”) Complaint? (ECF No, 1; “Compl.”). Plaintiff opposed? the Motion (ECF No. 12-1; “Opp”; see also ECF No. 11), and Defendant replied (ECF No. 12,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API