Legal Opinion

Dinardo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court properly denied defendant Board of Education’s motion at the close of plaintiffs case for judgment as a matter of law (CPLR 4401). Plaintiff, a special education teacher, was injured when she attempted to protect one of her students from attack by another student with a history of aggressive and disruptive behavior. “A motion for judgment at the close of all the evidence is substantially equivalent to one for a directed verdict made at that point ... In considering [such] a motion . . . the test to be applied is not founded upon a weighing of the evidence, but rather, in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Lipsius v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Candelier v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API