Legal Opinion · Dissent

Queal Lumber Co. v. Lipman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1925Published

1DissentFaville, C. J.

I cannot concur in the conclusion of the majority. The owner of the premises and the tenant entered into a written contract, by the terms of which the lessee agreed to erect certain improvements, the ownership of which was to vest in the -lessor ultimately. Appellees furnished the material for such improvements. Under such a contract, requiring the lessee to make improvements for the ultimate benefit of the lessor (owner), I do not believe, as stated by the majority, that “ it is too elementary to need discussion that the lien claimants cannot acquire a greater interest in the real estate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. KellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  2. Partello v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Veale Lumber Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Denniston & Partridge Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Schoeneman Lumber Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API