Legal Opinion
KENT WILLIAMS v. DR. WALTER CAMPBELL, et al.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 11, 2026No. 1:24-cv-00006Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO KENT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:24-cv-00006-BLW vs. SUCCESSIVE REVIEW ORDER DR. WALTER CAMPBELL, et al., Defendants. INTRODUCTION The docket of the United States District Court for the District of Idaho shows that the judges are doing their best to screen, manage, liberally construe, and adjudicate cognizable claims raised in Kent Williams’ many pro se prisoner complaints. For example, in Case 1:22-cv-00052-DCN, Williams v. Leeflang (Case 52), United States District Judge David C. Nye observed that Plaintiff had “filed a pro se…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.