Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Bell. Tried below before Hon. W. A. Blackburn.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

This is an.action against the railway company for damages resulting from injuries received in a collision with one of appellant’s railway trains at a public crossing. The grounds of negligence alleged in the petition consist in the failure to ring the bell or blow the whistle on the approach of the train to the public crossing, as required by law; that the train when approaching the crossing and at the time of the collision was being driven at a high rate of speed; and that the approach of the train, to persons traveling along the road and approaching the crossing, would…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hovey v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Weatherford, M. W. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Coffey v. Fort Worth & Denver Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Dolan v. O'RourkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Letsinger v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API