Legal Opinion

Richards v. Coweta Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1926No. 17096PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

1. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

2. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

(а) Some of the grounds are too defective to be considered by this court.

(б) Ground 5 of the motion for a new trial shows that the plaintiff introduced in evidence the schedule in bankruptcy of R. E. L. Jones, the claim of homestead exemption- as made by Jones in his schedule, and the trustee’s report setting aside the homestead as claimed. This ground of the motion shows that the defendant’s objections to all three of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McSwain v. EstroffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cowart & Dancer v. BushCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API