Legal Opinion

Kyle Soltesz v. Rushmore Plaza Civic Center

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2017No. 15-3264PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

Kyle Soltesz ran a concession stand in the Rushmore Plaza Civic Center in Rapid City, South Dakota. He sued the Civic Center and the City after his lease was terminated — supposedly without due process — and his property seized. At trial, Soltesz alleged municipal liability premised on the decision of a final policymaker. See Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 482-83, 106 S.Ct. 1292, 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986). The district court failed to identify the final policymaker as a matter of state law. Because the Supreme Court demands a district court make such an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Mark Atkinson v. City of Mountain ViewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Larenzo Irvin v. Tyler RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Dewey Barnett, II v. Brenda ShortCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  3. Benner v. St. Paul Pub. Sch.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
  4. Aery v. Pine County Ambulance ServiceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  5. Ball-Bey v. ChandlerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API