Legal Opinion

People v. Coleman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1972No. Docket Nos. 20978, 20979PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

An information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County charged defendants in count I with a violation of section 11911 of the Health and Safety Code (possession for sale of a restricted dangerous drug, amphetamine or “speed”). Count II charged them with a violation of section 11530.5 of the Health and Safety Code (possession for sale of a narcotic, marijuana).

Defendants pleaded not guilty. Their motions under sections 995 and 1538.5 of the Penal Code were denied. They were tried by a jury and found guilty. A new trial and probation were denied.

Facts

An outline of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. People v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Orange Co. Water Dist. v. AlcoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Orange County Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global FastenersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API