Legal Opinion

Bowdry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1936No. A-9074PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of possession of intoxicating liquors, and sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of 3'0 days. Before the case was called for trial the defendant filed a motion to suppress the evidence on the ground that the officers when they searched his home were not armed with a good and valid search warrant authorizing them to search his home and premises. Testimony in support of motion to suppress was taken, in which a copy of what purported to be the affidavit for a search…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. KelihDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Kuhn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Mathis v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Merry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API