Legal Opinion
Red Zone LLC v. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 2016No. 5PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should he modified, with costs, by denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and reinstating defendant’s affirmative defenses of the statute of limitations and comparative negligence and, as so modified, affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to defendant as the non-movant (see generally Vega v Restani Constr. Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012]; Ortiz v Varsity Holdings, LLC, 18 NY3d 335, 339 [2011]), material triable questions of fact exist regarding whether defendant failed to exercise the ordinary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Vega v. Restani Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ortiz v. Varsity Holdings, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Dombrowski v. BulsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- John W. Grace v. Michael R. LawNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
3Cited by17 opinions
- Toalongo v. Almarwa Ctr., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Cox v. Mccormick Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Creative Rest., Inc. v. Dyckman Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Lavelle-Tomko v. Aswad & IngrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Davis v. KhalilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.