Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Johnson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 2016No. 2016-KA-0259Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLobrano, J.

hi respectfully concur in the result of the majority’s affirmation of Defendant’s conviction. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s finding that Defendant’s mandatory life sentence without the benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence under La. R.S. 15:529.1(A)(4)(b) (a quadruple offender mandatory life sentence) is per se excessive. I would remand the case for an adequate downward departure hearing. Then, if the Defendant meets his burden of establishing that he is exceptional, I would order the district court to resentence Defendant to the longest sentence that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  2. Duckworth v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  3. State v. BurnsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. State v. MosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  5. State v. EllisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API