Legal Opinion

International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 279 v. Sid Richardson Carbon Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1973No. 71-3389PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAHAM, Circuit Judge:

Sid Richardson Carbon Company has a plant in Odessa, Texas, producing carbon black. The plant utilizes two methods of production — a traditional method of burning natural gas in a channel (a channel plant) and a second more experimental process of production by incomplete burning of oil in a furnace (a furnace plant). Local 279 of the International Union of Operating Engineers has been the recognized collective bargaining agent for the production employees at the channel plant at all times relevant to this appeal. Employees at the furnace plant were also represented by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harold A. Boire Etc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Local Union 204 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Affiliated With the Afl-Cio v. Iowa Electric Light and Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Carpenters Local Union No. 1846 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. Pratt-Farnsworth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Chief Freight Lines Co. v. Local Union No. 886Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  5. Local Union No. 77 v. Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API