Carleton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Error from the County Court of McLennan. Tried below before Hon. G. B. Gerald, County Judge. Writ of error from final judgment on forfeited recognizance. Ho statement required.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSOH, Presiding Judge.
This writ of error is prosecuted from a judgment final on forfeited recognizance. The history of the case shows that appellant Carleton was convicted in the County Court of- McLennan County of a misdemeanor, and prosecuted his appeal to this court, where the judgment was affirmed. Hill and Grant, appellants, were sureties on his recognizance on appeal to this court. The judgment being affirmed by this court' in May, 1899, mandate issued in June following. Shortly afterward, during the month of July, capias pro fine issued from the County Court of McLennan County,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Ex Parte SalisburyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Suspended Sentence, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1947